Search for: All records

Fluid release associated with serpentinite dehydration (de-serpentinization) during subduction plays a key role in fundamental geological processes such as element transport and recycling, seismicity, and arc magmatism. Although the importance of these fluids is well-known, evidence of de-serpentinization remains scarce in the rock record. Here, we investigated the effects of de-serpentinization and fluid circulation in exhumed metaperidotites from the Raspas Complex (Ecuador). This Early Cretaceous complex records warm subduction (∼13.5 °C/km) and has been hypothesized to represent a coherent slab sliver that preserves the mantle-crust contact (moho) between eclogite-facies metaperidotites and the corresponding crustal section. Petrological observations reveal that titanian-clinohumite-bearing metadunites and banded metaperidotites underwent de-serpentinization after reaching peak pressure–temperatures (P–T) of ∼1.3–1.6 GPa and 620–650 °C. The peak paragenesis is partially obscured by a strong retrograde overprint, driven by crust-derived metamorphic fluids (δ11B ∼ -6 to +8 ‰) that infiltrated at varying fluid/rock ratios, triggering the re-serpentinization of metaperidotites during exhumation (P < 1.3 GPa and 320–400 °C). Thermodynamic forward modeling reveals that fluid release in the Raspas paleo-subduction zone is controlled by brucite breakdown and de-serpentinization, which occur at depths of 25–30 km and ∼50 km, respectively, accounting for a total of up to 10 wt. % H2O of water stored in the rock. Comparatively, dehydration of the crustal section, albeit a minor component, promotes enhanced fluid circulation between 25 and 45 km. During exhumation, circulating crust-derived metamorphic fluids heavily metasomatized the ascending slab sliver and effectively modified its geochemical signature. The depth range of the dehydration reactions overlap the depth of non-volcanic tremors and slow-slip events in warm, active subduction zones worldwide (25–65 km). Thus, the Raspas Complex offers an in-situ window into the fluids responsible for triggering these seismic events. 

Abstract Eclogite thermobarometry is crucial for constraining the depths and temperatures to which oceanic and continental crust subduct. However, obtaining the pressure and temperature (P–T) conditions of eclogites is complex as they commonly display high‐variance mineral assemblages, and the mineral compositions only vary slightly withP–T. In this contribution, we present a comparison between two independent and commonly used thermobarometric approaches for eclogites: conventional thermobarometry and forward phase‐equilibrium modelling. We assess how consistent the thermobarometric calculations are using the garnet–clinopyroxene–phengite barometer and garnet–clinopyroxene thermometer with predictions from forward modelling (i.e. comparing the relative differences between approaches). Our results show that the overall mismatch in methods is typically ±0.2–0.3 GPa and ±29–42°C although differences as large as 80°C and 0.7 GPa are possible for a few narrow ranges ofP–Tconditions in the forward models. Such mismatch is interpreted as the relative differences among methods, and not as absolute uncertainties or accuracies for either method. For most of the investigatedP–Tconditions, the relatively minor differences between methods means that the choice in thermobarometric method itself is less important for geological interpretation than careful sample characterization and petrographic interpretation for derivingP–Tfrom eclogites. Although thermobarometry is known to be sensitive to the assumedX_Fe³⁺of a rock (or mineral), therelativedifferences between methods are not particularly sensitive to the choice of bulk‐rockX_Fe³⁺, except at high temperatures (>650°C, amphibole absent) and for very large differences in assumedX_Fe³⁺(0–0.5). We find that the most important difference between approaches is the activity–composition (a–x) relations, as opposed to the end‐member thermodynamic data or other aspects of experimental calibration. When equivalenta–xrelations are used in the conventional barometer,Pcalculations are nearly identical to phase‐equilibrium models (ΔP < 0.1). To further assess the implications of these results for real rocks, we also evaluate common mathematical optimizations of reaction constants used for obtaining the maximumP–Twith conventional thermobarometric approaches (e.g. using the highestaGrs² × aPrp in garnet and Si content in phengite, and the lowestaDi in clinopyroxene). These approaches should be used with caution, because they may not represent the compositions of equilibrium mineral assemblages at eclogite facies conditions and therefore systematically biasP–Tcalculations. Assuming method accuracy, geological meaningfulP_maxat a typical eclogite facies temperature of ~660°C will be obtained by using the greatestaDi,aCel, andaPrp and lowestaGrs andaMs; garnet and clinopyroxene with the lowest Fe²⁺/Mg ratios may yield geological meaningfulT_maxat a typical eclogite facies pressure of 2.5 GPa.